Introduction
Plastic has transformed modern agriculture. Farmers across Pakistan and the globe use plastic mulch, greenhouses, and drip systems. These materials boost crop yields, conserve water, and suppress weeds. However, their environmental costs are becoming hard to ignore.
According to the FAO (2021), the world uses 12.5 million tonnes of plastic annually in agriculture. This figure includes greenhouse covers, irrigation pipes, and mulching films. Unfortunately, the majority ends up in landfills or open fields.
Plastic Use in Pakistani Agriculture: A Growing Trend
In Pakistan, plasticulture is growing fast. As of 2024, over 30,000 tonnes of agricultural plastics are used every year (Pak-EPA). Farmers in Punjab and Sindh rely heavily on plastic mulch to retain soil moisture and reduce input costs.
Benefits include:
- Up to 60% reduction in water loss through evaporation (NARC, 2024)
- 30–40% savings in herbicide costs due to weed suppression
- Extended growing seasons, with income gains of 20–40% under plastic greenhouses (Pakistan Horticulture Board, 2024)
Plastic helps improve agricultural productivity. However, the environmental price is rising.
Environmental Concerns: The Hidden Cost of Plasticulture
Despite its advantages, agricultural plastic poses serious environmental risks.
1. Poor Waste ManagementGlobally, only 13% of farm plastics are recycled (UNEP, 2022). In Pakistan, most used plastic ends up in open fields or is burned. This leads to soil degradation and toxic air pollution.
2. Microplastic ContaminationRecent WWF-Pakistan (2024) studies reveal alarming microplastic levels in agricultural soil — up to 1,400 particles/kg in Punjab’s croplands. These microplastics harm beneficial microbes and disrupt nutrient cycles.
3. Water PollutionPlastic residues block irrigation systems and contaminate surface water. Fragmented plastics enter canals, rivers, and eventually groundwater.
4. Chemical LeachingUnder Pakistan’s intense sunlight, plastics degrade faster. They release harmful chemicals like phthalates and bisphenols into the soil, which can enter crops and pose health risks. The true cost of plastic pollution: effects, impacts, and hopeful solutions
Pros and Cons of Plastic Use in Agriculture
ProsCons
Conserves water in arid regionsCreates non-biodegradable wasteSuppresses weeds without chemicalsContributes to microplastic pollutionReduces pesticide and fertilizer useIncreases disposal costsExtends growing seasonsReleases harmful chemicals when burnedImproves crop yield and qualityDegrades soil health over time
Solutions: Toward Sustainable Plastic Use in Farming
To balance productivity with environmental care, Pakistan and other countries must act decisively.
✅ Promote Biodegradable Alternatives
Bioplastics decompose naturally and reduce waste. However, they cost 50% more than regular plastics (NARC, 2024). Subsidies can encourage adoption among small farmers.
Comparison of Biodegradable Plastics in Agriculture
Type of Biodegradable PlasticSource MaterialKey Use in AgricultureProsConsRelevance to PakistanPLA (Polylactic Acid)
Corn starch or sugarcaneMulch films, planting potsBiobased, compostable, transparentBrittle, costly, needs industrial compostingSuitable in controlled trials; cost limits large-scale usePBAT (Polybutylene Adipate Terephthalate)Petrochemical + renewable blendsMulch filmsFlexible, soil-biodegradable, mixes with PLANot fully bio-based, still expensivePromising if subsidized; suits water-scarce areasPHA (Polyhydroxyalkanoates)Bacteria-fed on sugars or waste oilsCoatings, slow-release fertilizer filmsFully biodegradable, marine-safeHigh production cost, limited availabilityIdeal for high-value crops; early research stage in PakistanStarch-Based BlendsCorn, potato, wheat starchMulch, nursery bagsCheap, biodegradable in soil, farmer-friendlyPoor water resistance, breaks down fastHighly relevant; can integrate with local agri-wasteCellulose-Based FilmsWood pulp, cotton linterWrapping, light mulchingNatural, compostable, good breathabilityWeak mechanical strength, costlyUseful in cooler regions; not fit for harsh climatesCoir/Palm Fiber MatsCoconut husk or palm wasteMulch mats, seedling traysLocally sourced, sustainable, suppresses weedsDecomposes quickly, not plastic-likeExtremely relevant; can boost rural coir industries
🧪 Performance Summary (by category)
FeatureBest Performing OptionSoil biodegradability
PBAT, Starch blendsWater resistancePBAT, PLACost-effectivenessStarch-based blends, Coir matsClimate suitabilityPBAT, Starch blends (arid/hot areas)Local production potentialCoir/Palm mats, Starch blends
📌 Key Insights for Pakistan:
- Starch-based and coir-based films offer low-cost, local alternatives using agri-waste.
- PBAT-PLA blends are technically superior but need government subsidies to scale up.
- Research institutions like NIBGE, PCSIR, and NARC should lead trials and promote on-farm biodegradable plastic innovation.
✅ Implement Collection & Recycling Systems
Pakistan lacks formal systems to collect used farm plastics. Local governments must establish rural plastic recycling stations to prevent open dumping.
✅ Launch Farmer Awareness Campaigns
Most farmers lack training in proper disposal methods. Public outreach can reduce burning and encourage responsible use.
✅ Enforce Policy Regulations
Plastic use in agriculture remains unregulated in many provinces. Policies must mandate biodegradable plastic use and restrict single-use films.
My Opinion
Plastic in agriculture offers undeniable short-term benefits. Yet it silently erodes long-term sustainability. Pakistan, like many nations, stands at a crossroads. With thoughtful policy, better technology, and farmer education, we can ensure plastic supports — not sabotages — our future food systems.
Plastic may grow the seed, but we must sow wisely to save the soil.
some related to my blogs
Japan Develops New Biodegradable Plastic That Dissolves in Seawater
