Peru’s Amazon rainforest faces a grave threat following a controversial amendment to the country’s Forestry and Wildlife Law, which environmental experts warn that Amazon deforestation laws could accelerate deforestation at an alarming rate. The amendment, enacted in March 2025, has eliminated critical protections for one of the world’s most biodiverse regions, creating legal pathways for increased forest conversion and potentially legitimizing years of illegal deforestation activities. This legislative change represents a significant step backward in forest conservation efforts and has sparked fierce opposition from environmental organizations, indigenous communities, and international observers.
Intoduciton
1.1 Context Setting:
Peru hosts the second-largest portion of the Amazon rainforest after Brazil, covering over 70 million hectares—approximately 60% of the country’s total territory. This vast expanse of forest represents one of Earth’s most crucial ecosystems, serving as home to countless species and numerous indigenous communities, some living in voluntary isolation. In December 2023, the Peruvian Congress approved amendment 1973 to the Forestry and Wildlife Law. Amazon deforestation laws were subsequently promulgated in January 2024 despite significant opposition.
1.2 Purpose:
This analysis examines how the recent amendment to Peru’s Forestry and Wildlife Law fundamentally undermines forest protection mechanisms and creates dangerous precedents that put the Amazon rainforest at unprecedented risk. By removing key regulatory safeguards, the amendment threatens to accelerate deforestation rates in a country already losing between 150,000 and 200,000 hectares of forest annually.
1.3 Relevance:
The implications of this legal change extend far beyond Peru’s borders. Locally, the amendment threatens indigenous peoples’ rights, livelihoods, and the biodiversity upon which they depend. Globally, the increased deforestation will exacerbate climate change, as the Amazon’s deforestation already accounts for approximately 60% of Peru’s greenhouse gas emissions. The amendment also contradicts Peru’s international commitments to reduce deforestation and protect biodiversity, raising questions about the country’s environmental governance, Amazon deforestation laws, and climate commitments.
Background on Peru’s Amazon and Forestry Policies
2.1 The Role of the Amazon:
The Peruvian Amazon represents one of the planet’s most biodiverse regions and plays a vital role in regulating global climate patterns through carbon sequestration. The forest is home to more than 50 indigenous peoples, whose traditional knowledge and practices have been instrumental in preserving these ecosystems for generations of Amazonians. These communities serve as crucial guardians of the forest, maintaining ecological balance while depending on forest resources for their cultural and physical survival.
2.2 Historical Forestry Legislation:
Before the recent amendment, Peru’s Forestry and Wildlife Law of 2011 established strong protective measures for forest conservation. This framework required rigorous state approval and environmental impact studies before any change in forest land use could be authorized. These regulatory safeguards were designed to ensure sustainable forest management while preventing illegal deforestation and land conversion. The Amazon deforestation laws represented a commitment to balancing development needs with environmental protection.
2.3 Trigger for Amendment:
The push to amend the forestry law appears to have been driven by agricultural expansion interests and pressures from companies seeking to legitimize past illegal deforestation activities. While supporters claim the amendment aims to alleviate poverty by helping small farmers access international markets, particularly the European Union, critics maintain that large agribusiness interests are the primary beneficiaries Primary Beneficieries. The amendment was rushed through Congress in December 2023 without proper consultation with affected indigenous communities, raising serious concerns about the democratic legitimacy of the process Democratic Legitimacy.
Key Provisions of the Forestry Law Amendment
3.1 Summary of Changes:
The most controversial aspect of the amendment is the elimination of the requirement that landowners or companies obtain state authorization before converting forested land to other uses, such as agriculture. Even more concerning, the Amazon deforestation laws include provisions that retroactively legalize past illegal deforestation, effectively providing amnesty to those who violated previous forest protection laws. While Peru’s Constitutional Court struck down some parts of the amendment following a legal challenge, it left intact the law’s final provision validating past illegal land-use changes.
3.2 Intended Objectives vs. Environmental Risks:
Supporters of the amendment, including Congresswoman Maria Zeta Chunga, argue it will stabilize Peru’s agricultural sector and provide farmers with greater legal certainty. They further claim the amendment will help smaller producers meet European Union import requirements under the new EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR)EU Deforestation Regulation. However, environmental experts reject , noting that legitimizing illegal deforestation contradicts rather than complies with EU regulations. Critics warn the amendment will accelerate forest clearing, primarily benefiting large corporations that have been deforesting illegally, such as palm oil producer Ocho Sur, which supplies major transnational companies.
Environmental and Social Impacts
4.1 Threats to Biodiversity:
The amendment poses direct threats to Peru’s extraordinary biodiversity. By removing the requirement for environmental impact assessments and state authorization for land-use conversion, the law opens previously protected areas to development activities that inevitably lead to habitat destruction. The Amazon rainforest contains countless species, many still undiscovered, that face increased extinction risks as deforestation accelerates. Peru’s already high deforestation rate—between 150,000 and 200,000 hectares. Annually, it is expected to worsen under the amended law.
4.2 Impact on Indigenous Communities:
Indigenous peoples are particularly vulnerable to the consequences of this amendment. The law was enacted without proper consultation with indigenous communities. It is violating their right to free, prior, and informed consent on matters affecting their territories. The amendment endangers previously unreached Amazon indigenous peoples who are highly vulnerable to diseases brought by outsiders. It also increases risks for communities whose lands have not yet been officially titled, potentially exposing them to land grabbing and displacement. The situation is especially concerning given that 33 indigenous leaders have been assassinated in the past decade while defending their territories.
4.3 Climate Change Implications:
The forestry law amendment directly undermines Peru’s climate commitments. Deforestation already accounts for approximately 60% of Peru’s greenhouse gas emissions2. By facilitating increased forest clearing, the amendment will inevitably increase carbon emissions at a time when global climate scientists are calling for urgent action to reduce deforestation. This contradiction is particularly striking given that Peru hosted the UN Climate Change Conference (COP 20) in Lima in 2014, where the government publicly committed to helping “cool the planet”4.
Political and Public Response
5.1 Government Position:
The Peruvian government, through supporters in Congress, has defended the amendment. By saying it is necessary to provide legal certainty to agricultural producers and facilitate access to international markets. However, the hasty passage of the legislation without proper consultation suggests limited interest in balancing economic objectives with environmental protection. When approached by journalists, representatives of Peru’s agribusiness sector and supporting politicians largely declined to comment on the controversy.
5.2 Opposition and Protests:
The amendment has sparked fierce resistance from environmental organizations, indigenous rights groups, and legal experts. The Peru Support Group held a webinar. Where experts called the amendment “a disaster” that will encourage rapid deforestation. The National Coordination of Human Rights and the bishops of the Peruvian Amazon have condemned the legislation. Legal challenges have been mounted. It included a constitutional challenge that resulted in the court striking down some provisions while upholding others.
5.3 International Reaction:
International organizations have expressed serious concerns about the amendment’s implications. The Canadian embassy has stated that the new law may contradict Peru’s commitments to protect the environment and biodiversity. It reduces greenhouse gas emission. UN rapporteur Francisco Calí Tzay has specifically warned about the dangers posed by this law to indigenous peoples and their territories. The amendment also risks complicating Peru’s trade relationships. Particularly with the European Union, whose Deforestation Regulation prohibits the import of goods produced on illegally deforested land.
Case Studies and Recent Incidents
6.1 Examples of Affected Areas:
While the amendment is relatively recent, Peru’s Amazon has already been suffering from significant deforestation pressures. Unlike neighboring Brazil and Colombia. Although it has made progress in reducing deforestation rates in recent years, Peru’s forest loss has been increasing. The amendment threatens to exacerbate existing hotspots of deforestation. Particularly in areas targeted for agricultural expansion, such as palm oil plantations.
6.2 Comparative Analysis:
Peru’s regression in forest protection stands in stark contrast to recent conservation efforts in other Amazonian countries. Brazil has made significant progress in reducing deforestation under President Lula’s administration. After years of increased forest clearing under former President Bolsonaro, Peru is moving in the opposite direction. This divergence is particularly concerning as regional cooperation is essential for protecting the Amazon basin as an integrated ecosystem.
6.3 Data and Reports:
Environmental lawyer César Ipenza, commenting on the Constitutional Court’s ruling, noted that “the court admits the law violated Indigenous rights and [tribes] should have been consulted but it still endorses the most harmful part”. Julia Urrunaga from the Environmental Investigation Agency has highlighted that large companies deforesting illegally are the primary beneficiaries of the amendment, citing palm oil producer Ocho Sur, which supplies major international brands like Kellogg, Nestle, and Colgate.
Potential Solutions and Call for Action
7.1 Policy Recommendations:
Immediate repeal or substantial revision of the amendment should be a priority to restore critical forest protections. Any future forestry legislation must include mandatory environmental impact assessments, transparent approval processes for land-use changes, and mechanisms to prevent retroactive legalization of illegal activities. Policymakers should prioritize forest conservation while developing sustainable economic alternatives that don’t require forest clearing.
7.2 Strengthening Protection Mechanisms:
Indigenous-led conservation initiatives have demonstrated significant success in forest protection. Models like the “Veeduría Forestal” or Forestry Oversight, formed by indigenous communities to curb illegal logging and increase transparency in forest management, offer promising approachesForestry Oversight. These community-based mechanisms should be supported and expanded with appropriate resources and legal recognition to ensure effective forest governance.
7.3 Role of Civil Society:
Environmental organizations, indigenous alliances, and international partners must continue to pressure the Peruvian government to strengthen forest protection. This includes monitoring and documenting forest loss, supporting legal challenges to harmful policies, and advocating for indigenous land rights. Consumers and companies in importing countries should demand transparency in supply chains to ensure they are not supporting Amazon deforestation laws .
Conculision
8.1 Recap:
The amendment to Peru’s Forestry and Wildlife Law represents a dangerous setback for Amazon conservation, threatening to accelerate deforestation by removing critical regulatory safeguards and legitimizing illegal forest clearing. The law undermines indigenous rights, threatens biodiversity, and contradicts Peru’s climate commitments. The situation is particularly concerning given that Peru holds the second-largest share of Amazon rainforest, whose preservation is vital for global climate stability.
8.2 Call to Action:
The preservation of Peru’s Amazon requires immediate action from multiple stakeholders. Policymakers must reconsider the amendment’s harmful provisions and restore strong forest protections. Indigenous communities need secure land rights and support for community-led conservation initiatives. International partners should use diplomatic and economic leverage to encourage sustainable forest management. Individuals worldwide can contribute by supporting organizations working to protect the Amazon and by ensuring their consumption doesn’t drive deforestation. The future of Peru’s Amazon—and its critical role in biodiversity conservation and climate regulation—depends on collective efforts to reverse this dangerous policy trend and establish truly sustainable governance of this irreplaceable ecosystem.
You can also read about blog about different law reforms. There are related blog you can may be interested in
1.How Bold Reforms Could Turn the Tide on Punjab’s Wheat Crisis
2.How Do Climate Policies Spark Bold Green Laws Now?
3.Global Youth at the UN: Leading the Charge for Climate Justice
